From the point of view of the history and philosophy of science, the relationship of Descartes' to Aristotle's concept of nature has not been grasped in an entirely satisfactory way. In this article, the two concepts will be subjected to a comparative analysis, beginning with the outstanding feature that both concepts of nature are characterized by a contradistinction to the non-natural: Aristotle separates nature and technology; Descartes opposes nature to thinking. My thesis is that these meanings have found privileged application in specific contexts of experience: the field of application especially suitable for the Aristotelian concept is the experience of everyday life, while for the Cartesian concept it is subjective experience. Historically, the relationship between meaning and experience is of help in understanding the conditions in which the two concepts arose. The topical relevance of the concepts to modern society is a consequence of the continued existence of the favored contexts of experience. Roughly stated, we sometimes still perceive in an Aristotelian way and at other times think in a Cartesian way
|Keywords||Context Kontext Nature nature|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philosophy in Science: An Historical Introduction.Michał Heller - 2011 - Springer.
Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
The Ontological Proof and the Notion of Experience in Schelling.Alessandro Medri - 2011 - Idealistic Studies 41 (1-2):69 - 82.
Self and Self-Consciousness: Aristotelian Ontology and Cartesian Duality.Andrea Christofidou - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 32 (2):134-162.
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind.Antonia Lolordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Heidegger's Reading of Aristotle's Concept of Pathos.Marjolein Oele - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):389-406.
The Preeminence of Use: Reevaluating the Relation Between Use and Exchange in Aristotle's Economic Thought.Todd S. Mei - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 523-548.
Descartes' Mind-Body Composites, Psychology and Naturalism.Lilli Alanen - 2008 - Inquiry 51 (5):464 – 484.
The Trapped Infinity: Cartesian Volition as Conceptual Nightmare.Edward S. Reed - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (1):101-121.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads139 ( #33,890 of 2,164,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #18,579 of 2,164,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?