Citizenship, reciprocity, and the gendered division of labor: A stability argument for gender egalitarian political interventions

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (2):174-209 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Despite women’s increased labor force participation, household divisions of labor remain highly unequal. Properly implemented, gender egalitarian political interventions such as work time regulation, dependent care provisions, and family leave initiatives can induce families to share work more equally than they currently do. But do these interventions constitute legitimate uses of political power? In this article, I defend the political legitimacy of these interventions. Using the conception of citizenship at the heart of political liberalism, I argue that citizens would accept political interventions aimed at protecting the ‘genuinely available option’ to enact gender egalitarian lifestyles. More strongly still, I argue that under certain circumstances, citizens would insist on the enactment of political interventions to protect this option. According to political liberalism’s constraints on legitimacy, this insistence renders these interventions not only legitimate but positively mandatory. It is legitimate for a state to exercise power to preserve the genuinely available option to enact a gender egalitarian lifestyle, and under certain circumstances, it is illegitimate for a state to fail to do so.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill, Political Economy, and Women's Work.Nancy J. Hirschmann - 2008 - American Political Science Review 102 (2):199-203.
Gender Justice.Anca Gheaus - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-24.
Alain Badiou: The Event of Becoming a Political Subject.Antonio Calcagno - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (9):1051-1070.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Is Workfare Egalitarian?Neil Hibbert - 2007 - Politics and Ethics Review 3 (2):200-216.
Neuromarketing: Ethical and Political Challenges.Neil Levy - 2009 - Etica E Politica 11 (2):10-17.
Terrorism and the Politics of Human Rights.Sharon Anderson-Gold - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:155-164.
Citizenship, Egalitarianism and Global Justice.Chris Armstrong - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):603-621.
Political Legitimacy, the Egalitarian Challenge, and Democracy.Dean J. Machin - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):101-117.
The Real Value of Equality.Robert Jubb - 2015 - Journal of Politics 77 (3):679-691.


Added to PP

63 (#186,655)

6 months
1 (#414,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gina Schouten
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Public Reason.Jonathan Quong - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Liberal Feminism.Amy Baehr - 2013 - In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. pp. 150-166.
Entitlement and Free Time.Rosa Terlazzo - 2017 - Law, Ethics, and Philosophy 5:91-104.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Justice as Fairness.John Rawls - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (2):164-194.

View all 20 references / Add more references