Can reproductive genetic manipulation save lives?

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (3):381-386 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It has recently been argued that reproductive genetic manipulation technologies like mitochondrial replacement and germline CRISPR modifications cannot be said to save anyone’s life because, counterfactually, no one would suffer more or die sooner absent the intervention. The present article argues that, on the contrary, reproductive genetic manipulations may be life-saving (and, from this, have therapeutic value) under an appropriate population health perspective. As such, popular reports of reproductive genetic manipulations potentially saving lives or preventing disease are not necessarily mistaken, though such terminology still requires further empirical validation.

Similar books and articles

Germline Manipulation and Our Future Worlds.John Harris - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):30-34.
When the Milk of Human Kindness Becomes a Luxury Good.Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (1):159-165.
Reproductive CRISPR does not cure disease.Tina Rulli - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (9):1072-1082.
The need for donor consent in mitochondrial replacement.G. Owen Schaefer - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):825-829.
Surrogate Motherhood As A Life-saving Measure In Jewish Law.W. Silverman & E. Clark - 1999 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 9 (4):101-104.


Added to PP

456 (#23,666)

6 months
38 (#34,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

G. Owen Schaefer
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

Gene editing, identity and benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
Gene Editing, Identity and Benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
Trojan Horses, Clinical Utility, and Parfitian Puzzles.Bryan Cwik - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):16-18.

Add more citations