Religious Studies 38 (3):283-300 (2002)

Authors
J. L. Schellenberg
Mount Saint Vincent University
Abstract
This paper begins by surveying some of the problems facing Swinburne 's general approach, finding unfortunate the absence from his tetralogy of a strategy that might have helped to alleviate them, namely an attempt to show that a traditional Christian creed is more probable than the creed of any other religion. It then discusses certain particular arguments of the tetralogy – arguments offered in defence of the traditional Christian doctrine of the Atonement – which are central to the detailed working out of the approach, concluding that they are unacceptable
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0034412502006091
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,089
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
32 ( #333,174 of 2,440,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,124 of 2,440,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes