Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):24-44 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Need-claims are ubiquitous within moral and political theory. However, need-based theories are often criticized for being too narrow in scope and too focused on the material preconditions for leading a decent life for grounding a substantial theory of social justice. The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, it will investigate the nature and scope of needs by analysing existing conceptualizations of the idea of needs. In so doing, we will get a better understanding of needs, which will help us to carve out the importance and singularity of basic need claims. Secondly, on the basis of the analysis of needs, it will argue for the concept of a fundamental interest in free social agency, which is much better suited than the idea of basic needs actually to ground a theory of social justice, as it highlights the social and institutional conditions for free agency. Thirdly, using the distinction between basic needs and fundamental interests, it will clarify their respective role in and importance for grounding moral principles. Overall, the paper offers a friendly critique of need-based theories, while arguing for a shift of focus to the idea of fundamental interests
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/13698230.2011.583532 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics.Peter Frederick Strawson - 1959 - London, England: Routledge.
View all 39 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Needing and Necessity.Guy Fletcher - 2018 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 170-192.
Freedom, Recognition and Non-Domination: A Republican Theory of (Global) Justice.Fabian Schuppert (ed.) - 2013 - Springer.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Political Liberalism, Marriage and the Family.Christie Hartley & Lori Watson - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (2):185-212.
Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope of Distributive Justice.Arash Abizadeh - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (4):318–358.
Basic Equality.Jeremy Waldron - 2008 - Nyu School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series Working Paper 8 (61).
Is Mozi a Utilitarian Philosopher?Changchi Hao - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):382-400.
On the Non-Instrumental Value of Basic Rights.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):441-461.
Interests, Universal and Particular: Bentham's Utilitarian Theory of Value.Gerald J. Postema - 2006 - Utilitas 18 (2):109-133.
Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family.Blain Neufeld - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-08-03
Total views
84 ( #136,813 of 2,498,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #211,850 of 2,498,537 )
2011-08-03
Total views
84 ( #136,813 of 2,498,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #211,850 of 2,498,537 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads