Distinguishing basic needs and fundamental interests

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):24-44 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Need-claims are ubiquitous within moral and political theory. However, need-based theories are often criticized for being too narrow in scope and too focused on the material preconditions for leading a decent life for grounding a substantial theory of social justice. The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, it will investigate the nature and scope of needs by analysing existing conceptualizations of the idea of needs. In so doing, we will get a better understanding of needs, which will help us to carve out the importance and singularity of basic need claims. Secondly, on the basis of the analysis of needs, it will argue for the concept of a fundamental interest in free social agency, which is much better suited than the idea of basic needs actually to ground a theory of social justice, as it highlights the social and institutional conditions for free agency. Thirdly, using the distinction between basic needs and fundamental interests, it will clarify their respective role in and importance for grounding moral principles. Overall, the paper offers a friendly critique of need-based theories, while arguing for a shift of focus to the idea of fundamental interests

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
Basic Empathy and Complex Empathy.Dan Zahavi - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (1):81-82.
Basic equality.Jeremy Waldron - 2008 - Nyu School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series Working Paper 8 (61).
Is Mozi a utilitarian philosopher?Changchi Hao - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):382-400.
What makes a basic structure just?Miriam Ronzoni - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):203-218.
On the Non-instrumental Value of Basic Rights.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):441-461.
Between science and technology.Joseph Agassi - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (1):82-99.
Coercion, the basic structure, and the family.Blain Neufeld - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-03

Downloads
112 (#159,238)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabian Schuppert
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

Human Needs: Overview.Michael A. Dover - 2023 - Oxford//Nasw Encyclopedia of Social Work Https://Doi.Org/10.1093/Acrefore/9780199975839.013.554.
Basic needs in normative contexts.Thomas Pölzler - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (5):e12732.
Needing and Necessity.Guy Fletcher - 2018 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 170-192.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics.Peter Strawson - 1959 - London, England: Routledge. Edited by Wenfang Wang.
The sources of normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Science, Perception and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars (ed.) - 1963 - New York,: Humanities Press.

View all 42 references / Add more references