Abstract
Previous studies have documented the fallibility of attempts by surrogates and physicians to act in a substituted judgment capacity and predict end-of-life treatment decisions on behalf of patients. We previously reported that physicians misperceive their patients' preferences and substitute their own preferences for those of their patients with respect to four treatments: cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest, ventilator for an indefinite period of time, medical nutrition and hydration for an indefinite period of time, and hospitalization in the event of pneumonia.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180100007751
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dwelling in the Shadow: Physicians' Decision-Making for Terminally Ill Patients.Stephen Vanhooser Mccrary - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
10 ( #843,325 of 2,411,745 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,023 of 2,411,745 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes