Authors
Eugene Schlossberger
Purdue University Calumet
Abstract
Benefit corporations, whose chartered mission includes attending to specific and general social benefits, are sometimes criticized as monstrous hybrids trying to serve two incompatible purposes. Dual-Investor Theory, which regards society as an investor in every business venture, answers this objection by providing a natural and compelling rationale for benefit corporations. Several other objections to benefit corporations are articulated and addressed, including the problems of greenwashing and mission drift; lack of clear direction; mismatch between quantitative measures and the nature of social benefit; and the charge that benefit corporations are unnecessary and create additional costs and burdens. When benefit corporations are understood in the light of Dual-Investor Theory, they constitute a potentially significant advance, more a hybrid rose than a monstrous hybrid.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0277-2027
DOI 10.5840/bpej201692242
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,856
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A New Model of Business: Dual-Investor Theory.Eugene Schlossberger - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):459-474.
The Magical Number Two, Plus or Minus: Dual Process Theory as a Theory of Cognitive Kinds.Richard Samuels - 2009 - In Keith Frankish & Jonathan St B. T. Evans (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 129--146.
Benefit Corporations.David Steingard - 2016 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 35 (1):1-4.
Differences in Moral Values Between Corporations.Paul C. Nystrom - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):971 - 979.
Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial.Daryl Koehn - 2016 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 35 (1):17-50.
Corporations and the Cause of Environmental Protection.Napoleon M. Mabaquiao - 2002 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 12 (1):11-15.
Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory.Wesley Cragg - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):113-142.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-23

Total views
12 ( #749,460 of 2,401,723 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,964 of 2,401,723 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes