Defending the indefensible

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):83-88 (2010)
Abstract
This response addresses criticisms in this journal of an Editorial written by Willem Landman and Udo Schuklenk. I demonstrate that the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights is in crucial aspects deficient, despite attempts in this journal to defend the Declaration against its critics. I focus on individual versus societal interests, research ethics, informed consent and the use of “human dignity” to illustrate the weaknesses of the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. This article concludes with reflections on what documents such as the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ought to be called to avoid the mislabelling of what essentially are policy documents.
Keywords UNESCO  Declaration Bioethics Human Rights  Schuklenk  Landman  Editorial  Developing World Bioethics  Research ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9209-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts.Doris Schroeder - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (2):230-238.
Dignity's Wooly Uplift.Udo Schüklenk & Anna Pacholczyk - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):ii-ii.
The Trouble with Universal Declarations.David Benatar - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):220–224.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: A Canon for the Ages?G. Trotter - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):195-203.
The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-02-06

Total downloads

27 ( #185,114 of 2,152,487 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #281,161 of 2,152,487 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums