Defending the morality of violent video games

Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):127-138 (2010)
The effect of violent video games is among the most widely discussed topics in media studies, and for good reason. These games are immensely popular, but many seem morally objectionable. Critics attack them for a number of reasons ranging from their capacity to teach players weapons skills to their ability to directly cause violent actions. This essay shows that many of these criticisms are misguided. Theoretical and empirical arguments against violent video games often suffer from a number of significant shortcomings that make them ineffective. This essay argues that video games are defensible from the perspective of Kantian, Aristotelian, and utilitarian moral theories.
Keywords Aristotle   Computer game   Kant   Utilitarianism   Video game   Violence   Virtual world
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-010-9222-x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - Courier Dover Publications.
Practical Philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
The Extended Mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Getting 'Virtual' Wrongs Right.Robert Francis John Seddon - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (1):1-11.
Value, Violence, and the Ethics of Gaming.Goerger Michael - forthcoming - Ethics and Information Technology.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

1,073 ( #520 of 2,146,210 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

46 ( #5,099 of 2,146,210 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums