Joachim Schulte
University of Zürich
It is often claimed that certain remarks by Wittgenstein reveal him to have been an unsympathetic reader of Shakespeare and an unappreciative judge of the latter’s achievements. In the present paper, I attempt to show that this sort of observation is not only wrong but due to an inadequate perspective. An examination of the relevant remarks may bring to light a number of more or less interesting principles of evaluation, or aesthetic maxims and appraisals, but these do not say much about Shakespeare’s works, nor are the meant to be instructive in this way. What Wittgenstein’s remarks are really about is his own intellectual physiognomy: it is by way of contrast, by comparing certain features of Shakespeare with what he supposes to be characteristic of himself, that he hopes to learn about the limits and potentialities of his own personality
Keywords Shakespeare William  romanticism  Wittgenstein Ludwig  Culture and Value  poetry  20th Century Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,949
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition.M. H. Abrams - 1953 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12 (4):527-527.
Freud and Wittgenstein.Brian McGuinness - 1982 - In Anthony Kenny & Brian McGuinness (eds.), Wittgenstein and His Times. University of Chicago Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Wittgenstein's Enigmatic Remarks on Shakespeare.Wolfgang Andreas Huemer - forthcoming - In Craig Bourne & Emily Caddick Bourne (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Shakespeare and Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein at His Word.Duncan Richter - 2004 - Thoemmes Continuum.
Wittgenstein, Tolstoy, and Shakespeare.Peter B. Lewis - 2005 - Philosophy and Literature 29 (2):241-255.
Wittgenstein, Shakespeare, and Metaphysical Wit.Jonathan Pugh - 2012 - Philosophy and Literature 36 (1):238-248.
Moses : Wittgenstein on Names.Joachim Schulte - 2009 - In P. M. S. Hacker, Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P. M. S. Hacker. Oxford University Press.
Shakespeare and Literary Theory.Jonathan Gil Harris - 2010 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #484,290 of 2,439,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,317 of 2,439,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes