In Arthur Sullivan (ed.), Sensations, Thoughts, Language: Essays in Honor of Brian Loar. Routledge (forthcoming)

Authors
Stephen Schiffer
New York University
Abstract
Brian Loar attempted to provide the Gricean program of intention-based semantics with an account of expression-meaning. But the theory he presented, like virtually every other foundational semantic or meta-semantical theory, was an idealization that ignored vagueness. What would happen if we tried to devise theories that accommodated the vagueness of vague expressions? I offer arguments based on well-known features of vagueness that, if sound, show that neither Brian’s nor any other extant theory could successfully make that adjustment, and this because, if sound, the arguments show not only that nothing can be the content of a vague expression, but also that no spoken language has a compositional semantics. This raises the question of what, really, are the facts about a language whose explanation might seem to require the language to have a compositional semantics, and whether there might not be a way to explain those facts on the assumption that the language doesn’t have a compositional semantics. In response to this question I offer a rough sketch of a view designed to suggest how what needs to be explained might be explained without appeal to compositional semantics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Kellogg Lewis - 1969 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Meaning.H. Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gricean Semantics and Vague Speaker-Meaning.Stephen Schiffer - 2017 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):293-317.
Language Understanding and Compositional Semantics.Ligia Maria Romer - 1999 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Vagueness.Nicholas Jeremy Josef Smith - 2001 - Dissertation, Princeton University
A Little Help From Your Friends?Stephen Schiffer - 2001 - Legal Theory 7 (4):421-431.
Theories of Vagueness.Rosanna Keefe - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Vagueness in Context.Stewart Shapiro - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness and Language Use.Paul Égré & Nathan Klinedinst (eds.) - 2010 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reference and Intentionality.Nathan Tawil - 1987 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Vague Analysis.Dennis Earl - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-19

Total views
237 ( #42,593 of 2,456,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #16,533 of 2,456,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes