Ethical considerations of the human–animal-relationship under conditions of asymmetry and ambivalence
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):7-16 (2005)
Ethical reflection deals not only with the moral standing and handling of animals, it should also include a critical analysis of the underlying relationship. Anthropological, psychological, and sociological aspects of the human–animal-relationship should be taken into account. Two conditions, asymmetry and ambivalence, are taken as the historical and empirical basis for reflections on the human–animal-relationship in late modern societies. These conditions explain the variety of moral practice, apart from paradoxes, and provide a framework to systematize animal ethical problems in a broader field. This allows the development of ideal relationships as moral orientation across anthropocentric or sentientistic ethical theories. These ideal relationships are called the patronage-model, the friendship-model and the partnership-model. The ethical problem of creating transgenic animals is discussed in the light of these ideal relationships.
|Keywords||ambivalence animal biotechnology animal ethics asymmetry human–animal-relationship|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Ethical Contract as a Tool in Organic Animal Husbandry.Vonne Lund, Raymond Anthony & Helena Röcklinsberg - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):23-49.
Two Concepts of Dignity for Humans and Non-Human Organisms in the Context of Genetic Engineering.Philipp Balzer, Klaus Peter Rippe & Peter Schaber - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):7-27.
Animal Rearing as a Contract?Catherine Larrère & Raphaël Larrère - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):51-58.
Models for Ethical Medicine in a Revolutionary Age.Robert M. Veatch - 1972 - Hastings Center Report 2 (3):5-7.
Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals: Beyond Animal Welfare.Marcel Dol (ed.) - 1999 - Van Gorcum.
Citations of this work BETA
Frames and Ambivalence in Context: An Analysis of Hands-On Experts' Perception of the Welfare of Animals in Traveling Circuses in The Netherlands. [REVIEW]Hanneke J. Nijland, Noelle M. C. Aarts & Reint Jan Renes - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):523-535.
Constructing the Biotech Nonhuman Animal: Instrumentalism and Ambivalence.Sari Ung-Lanki - 2014 - Society and Animals 22 (5):439-458.
Similar books and articles
Competing Conceptions of Animal Welfare and Their Ethical Implications for the Treatment of Non-Human Animals.Richard Haynes - 2011 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):105-120.
The Philosophy of Animal Rights: A Brief Introduction for Students and Teachers.Mylan Engel Jr - 2010 - Lantern Books.
Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals.Maurice Hamington - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Ethics, Humans, and Other Animals: An Introduction with Readings.Rosalind Hursthouse - 2000 - Routledge.
Animals as Biotechnology: Ethics, Sustainability, and Critical Animal Studies.Richard Twine - 2010 - Earthscan.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Attitudes to Animals: Views in Animal Welfare.Francine L. Dolins (ed.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #134,712 of 2,163,687 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,209 of 2,163,687 )
How can I increase my downloads?