Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1333-1344 (2016)
AbstractEach of the major engineering societies has its own code of ethics. Seven “common core” clauses and several code-specific clauses can be identified. The paper articulates objections to and rationales for two clauses that raise controversy: do engineers have a duty to provide pro bono services and/or speak out on major issues, and to associate only with reputable individuals and organizations? This latter “association clause” can be justified by the “proclamative principle,” an alternative to Kant’s universalizability requirement. At the heart of engineering codes of ethics, and implicit in what it is to be a moral agent, the “proclamative principle” asserts that one’s life should proclaim one’s moral stances. More specifically, it directs engineers to strive to insure that their actions, thoughts, and relationships be fit to offer to their communities as part of the body of moral precedents for how to be an engineer. Understanding codes of ethics as reflections of this principle casts light both on how to apply the codes and on the distinction between private and professional morality.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
The System of Ethics: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre.Johann Gottlieb Fichte - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work
A Gendered Approach to Science Ethics for US and UK Physicists.Elaine Howard Ecklund & Di Di - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):183-201.
Similar books and articles
Engineering Responsibilities in Lesser-Developed Nations: The Welfare Requirement.Charles E. Harris - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):321-331.
Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society.Steven P. Nichols - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337.
Vestal Virgins and Engineering Ethics.P. Aarne Vesilind - 2002 - Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):92-101.
Internationalizing Professional Codes in Engineering.C. E. Harris - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):503-521.
Just Sustainability? Sustainability and Social Justice in Professional Codes of Ethics for Engineers.Cletus S. Brauer - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):875-891.
Ethics and the Engineer: Professional Codes and the Rule of St. Benedict.W. Richard Bowen - 2012 - Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (3):277-294.
Personal Meaning and Ethics in Engineering.Mike W. Martin - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):545-560.
An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics.Michael Davis - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):33-48.
Sustaining Engineering Codes of Ethics for the Twenty-First Century.Diane Michelfelder & Sharon A. Jones - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):237-258.
A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics.Jacquie L'Etang - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):737 - 744.
Theoretical Considerations for a Meaningful Code of Professional Ethics.Karim Jamal & Norman E. Bowie - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):703 - 714.
Should Engineering Ethics Be Taught?Charles J. Abaté - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):583-596.
Nursing Ethics and Codes of Professional Conduct.Trevor Hussey - 1996 - Nursing Ethics 3 (3):250-258.
The Origin and Implications of Engineers' Obligations to the Public Welfare.Jerry W. Gravander - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:443 - 455.
Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.Simone Burg & Anke Gorp - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):235-256.