Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):391-429 (2012)

Authors
Philippe Schlenker
Institut Jean Nicod
Abstract
Recent semantic research has made increasing use of a principle, Maximize Presupposition, which requires that under certain circumstances the strongest possible presupposition be marked. This principle is generally taken to be irreducible to standard Gricean reasoning because the forms that are in competition have the same assertive content. We suggest, however, that Maximize Presupposition might be reducible to the theory of scalar implicatures. (i)First, we consider a special case: the speaker utters a sentence with a presupposition p which is not initially taken for granted by the addressee, but the latter takes the speaker to be an authority on the matter. Signaling the presupposition provides new information to the addressee; but it also follows from the logic of presupposition qua common belief that the presupposition is thereby satisfied (Stalnaker, Ling Philos 25(5–6):701–721, 2002). (ii) Second, we generalize this solution to other cases. We assume that even when p is common belief, there is a very small chance that the addressee might forget it (‘Fallibility’); in such cases, marking a presupposition will turn out to generate new information by re-establishing part of the original context. We also adopt from Raj Singh (Nat Lang Semantics 19(2):149–168, 2011) the hypothesis that presupposition maximization is computed relative to local contexts—and we assume that these too are subject to Fallibility; this accounts for cases in which the information that justifies the presupposition is linguistically provided. (iii) Finally, we suggest that our assumptions have benefits in the domain of implicatures: they make it possible to reinterpret Magri’s ‘blind’ (i.e. context-insensitive) implicatures as context-sensitive implicatures which just happen to be misleading
Keywords Presupposition  Implicatures  Pragmatics  Antipresuppositions  Implicated presuppositions
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11050-012-9085-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,481
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Common Ground.Robert C. Stalnaker - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):701-721.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 38 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Grammatical Marking of Givenness.Ivona Kučerová - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (1):1-30.
Quantity Implicatures.Bart Geurts - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Presuppositions and Anaphors in Attitude Contexts.Bart Geurts - 1998 - Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6):545-601.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
127 ( #83,018 of 2,446,302 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #231,958 of 2,446,302 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes