Authors
Jonah N. Schupbach
University of Utah
Abstract
Two recently popular metaphilosophical movements, formal philosophy and experimental philosophy, promote what seem to be conflicting methodologies. Nonetheless, I argue that the two can be mutually supportive. I propose an experimentally-informed variation on explication, a powerful formal philosophical tool introduced by Carnap. The resulting method, which I call “experimental explication,” provides the formalist with a means of responding to explication's gravest criticism. Moreover, this method introduces a philosophically salient, positive role for survey-style experiments while steering clear of several objections that critics of “positive experimental philosophy” raise. Thus, it provides the experimentalist with a more defensible example of how empirical work can have positive philosophical import. For these reasons, experimental explication should appeal to experimental philosophers and formal philosophers alike.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1111/phpr.12207
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Meaning and Necessity.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - University of Chicago Press.
Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]University of Chicago Press.

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Carnapian Explications, Experimental Philosophy, and Fruitful Concepts.Steffen Koch - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (6):700-717.
The Constituents of an Explication.Moritz Cordes - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):983-1010.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions.Sebastian Lutz - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):117-139.
Carnap on Concept Determination: Methodology for Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]James Justus - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (2):161-179.
Experimental Philosophy.Adam Feltz - 2009 - Analyze and Kritik 31 (1):201-219.
Explication of Inductive Probability.Patrick Maher - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):593 - 616.
Kant’s Explication and Carnap’s Explication.Giovanni Boniolo - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):289-298.
An Explication of 'Explication'.Joseph F. Hanna - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (1):28-44.
An Explication of Emergence.Elanor Taylor - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (3):653-669.
Experimental Philosophy and Apriority.Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa - 2014 - In Al Casullo & Josh Thurow (eds.), The a Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 45-66.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-24

Total views
113 ( #87,200 of 2,410,273 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,569 of 2,410,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes