Authors
Eugene Schlossberger
Purdue University Calumet
Abstract
This paper articulates a framework, “E,” for developing ethical claims about environmental issues. E is a general framework for constructing arguments and working out disputes, rather than a particular theory. It may be deployed in various ways by writers with quite different views to generate diverse arguments applying to a broad panoply of issues. E can serve as a common language between those who adopt anthropocentric and nonanthropocentric standpoints. E is anthropocentric in the sense that it begins with ideas about human excellence and human interests. Arguments employing E suggest that we, as human beings, have certain duties regarding the environment. Since it may also be true that various duties attach to being an organism of any stripe, that nature has intrinsic value, and so forth, arguments employing E can be seen as supplementing, rather than replacing, nonanthropocentric moral arguments. Moreover, E is anthropocentric in its methodology but not necessarily in its results. Some accounts of human excellence yield the sorts of obligations that biocentrists advocate. As a result, arguments employing E can have force with both those who adopt and those who reject non-anthropocentric standpoints.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1077-1999
DOI pcw20018214
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,899
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Environmental Ethics: An Aristotelian Approach.Eugene Schlossberger - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):15-26.
Moving Beyond Anthropocentrism.Lauren Oechsli - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):49-59.
Anthropocentric Indirect Arguments for Environmental Protection.Kevin C. Elliott - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (3):243-260.
Anthropocentric Indirect Arguments and Anthropocentric Moral Attitudes.Duncan Purves - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (3):267-270.
Rights & Nature: Approaching Environmental Issues by Way of Human Rights.Andrew T. Brei - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):393-408.
Biophilia and Biodiversity.Christian Diehm - 2012 - Environmental Ethics 34 (1):51-66.
Beyond Anthropocentrism.Robin Attfield - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:29-46.
Environmental Ethics.Clare Palmer, Katie McShane & Ron Sandler - 2014 - Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39:419-442.
Nature and Morality.Roger Paden - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (3):239-251.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-15

Total views
7 ( #998,643 of 2,402,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes