Equivalents of Mingle and positive paradox

Studia Logica 77 (1):117 - 128 (2004)
Abstract
Relevant logic is a proper subset of classical logic. It does not include among its theorems any ofpositive paradox A (B A).
Keywords Philosophy   Logic   Mathematical Logic and Foundations   Computational Linguistics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:STUD.0000034189.40308.d7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,840
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive?Gregor Damschen - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox.Susan Rogerson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Moore's Paradox and Moral Motivation.Michael Cholbi - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):495-510.
The Train Paradox.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):437-438.
Confirmation, Paradox, and Logic.Leif Eriksen - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-687.
Probabilistic Causality and Simpson's Paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Substructural Logics with Mingle.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):227-249.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

30 ( #173,029 of 2,178,217 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,012 of 2,178,217 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums