The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 44:207-214 (1998)
AbstractMoral philosophers, beginning with Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel, have recently broached the topic of moral luck in the philosophical literature. They limit their discussion however to considerations of how luck affects our ability to carry out actions or how it affects the consequences of our actions. I wish to suggest that luck is also an important factor in determining our actions as ends in themselves. What actions we may choose to perform for their own sake in a given situation depends much more than we might care to think on causes beyond our control. Our happiness rests ultimately on our luckiness.
Similar books and articles
Happiness and Meaningfulness: Some Key Differences.Thaddeus Metz - 2009 - In Lisa Bortolotti (ed.), Philosophy and Happiness. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 3-20.
Agency and luck.Joseph Raz - 2012 - In Ulrike Heuer & Gerald Lang (eds.), Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes From the Ethics of Bernard Williams. Oxford University Press, Usa.
Holding people responsible for what they do not control.Zofia Stemplowska - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):355-377.
Skill, luck, control, and intentional action.Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):341 – 352.
Happiness and the Willing Agent: The Ongoing Relevance of the Franciscan Tradition.Bonnie Kent - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:59-70.
Being Responsible, Taking Responsibility, and Penumbral Agency.David Enoch - 2011 - In Heuer and Lang (ed.), Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams. Oxford University Press, Usa.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads