Cambridge Scholars Press (2012)

Authors
Abstract
In his magnum opus, David Hume asserts that a person is “nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement.” (Treatise 252) Hume is clearly proud of his bold thesis, as is borne out by his categorical arguments and analyses on the self. Contributions like this will, in his opinion, help establish a new science of human nature, “which will not be inferior in certainty, and will be much superior in utility to any other of human comprehension.” (Treatise xix) Unfortunately for Hume, the bundle theory of the self subsequently elicits substantial criticism and hostility from numerous critics, both philosophical and non-philosophical. As confident as the young Scot is about the merits of his theory when he first proposes it, the sharp critical responses to his thought on the self ultimately compel him to withdraw his controversial views from public scrutiny. The irony is that the author of the bundle theory of the self himself acknowledges that his account of the self is seriously defective. In his appendix to the Treatise, Hume decries the labyrinth that his views on the self have driven him into. Five years in the making, Hume's Labyrinth: A Search for the Self explores in detail both Hume's views on the self and his critical reservations on an account of the self that would subsequently become highly influential in the philosophy of mind. -/- Central to Hume's Labyrinth is the suggestion that a careful analysis of the appendix to the Treatise throws an invaluable light on a number of elements fundamental to Hume's views on the self, not least of which is the role of Berkeley s views on language. While Hume often acknowledges the significance of Berkeley's philosophy in the Treatise, the argument here is that Berkeley's account of terms is the foundation of Hume's philosophy of the mind, with its contentious bundle theory of the self. And when this influence is assayed a new dimension of Hume's views on the self emerges. For now it appears that the bundle theory of the self is nothing but a heuristic device adopted by Hume to help further philosophical investigations into the mind. In short, it turns out that Hume is a pragmatist, intent on presenting an account of the self that researchers interested in the problems of human nature will find useful.
Keywords bundle theory  self  appendix  Hume  Berkeley  Treatise  philosophy of mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $37.60 used   Amazon page
Call number B1499.S45.S39 2012
ISBN(s) 9781443838955   1443838950   1443847429
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hume's Labyrinth.Alan Schwerin - 2012 - Annales Philosophici 5:69 - 84.
Hume on the Self.Alan Schwerin - 2012 - Metaphysica 13 (1):65-85.
Hume and The Self: A Critical Response.Alan Schwerin - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):15-30.
Hume on Morality.James Baillie - 2000 - Routledge.
Hume’s Reflections on the Identity and Simplicity of Mind.Donald C. Ainslie - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):557-578.
Politeness, Paris and the Treatise.Mikko Tolonen - 2008 - Hume Studies 34 (1):21-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-07-24

Total views
228 ( #50,001 of 2,517,824 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,238 of 2,517,824 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes