Hic Rhodos, hic salta: From reductionist semantics to a realist ontology of forceful dispositions

In G. Damschen, K. Stueber & R. Schnepf (eds.), Debating Dispositions: Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind. De Gruyter. pp. 143-167 (2009)

Authors
Markus Schrenk
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Abstract
It is widely believed that at least two developments in the last third of the 20th century have given dispositionalism—the view that powers, capacities, potencies, etc. are irreducible real properties—new credibility: (i) the many counterexamples launched against reductive analyses of dispositional predicates in terms of counterfactual conditionals and (ii) a new anti-Humean faith in necessary connections in nature which, it is said, owes a lot to Kripke’s arguments surrounding metaphysical necessity. I aim to show in this paper that necessity is, in fact, of little help for the dispositionalists. My argument makes use of one of the above mentioned counterexamples against Humean reduction: antidotes. Turning the tables, I ask how the dispositionalists themselves can deal with antidotes. The result will be to show that if the dispositionalists are to demystify antidote cases, they must make plausible a conceptualisation of dispositions that does not invoke any kind of necessity. I will cautiously suggest that the anti-Humean link dispositions bring to the world has to be thought of in terms of (Newtonian) forces.
Keywords Laws of Nature  Metaphysical Necessity  Dispositions  Powers
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.1515/9783110211825.143
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Laws in Nature.Stephen Mumford - 2002 - Routledge.
Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Finkish Dispositions.David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Powerlessness of Necessity.Markus Schrenk - 2010 - Noûs 44 (4):725-739.
Real Potential.Jennifer McKitrick - 2018 - In Kristina Engelhard & Michael Quante (eds.), Handbook of Potentiality. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 229-260.
Indirect Directness.Jennifer McKitrick - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-28

Total views
534 ( #8,534 of 2,285,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #10,212 of 2,285,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature