Intelligent Computer Evaluation of Offender’s Previous Record

Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):373-405 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper considers the problem of how to evaluate an offender’s criminal record. This evaluation is part of the sentencing process carried out by a judge, and may be complicated in the case of offenders with a heavy record. We give a comprehensive overview of the approach to an offender’s past record in various (Western) countries, considering the two major approaches: desert-based and utilitarian. The paper describes the determination of the parameters involved in the evaluation, and the construction of a decision support system to be used by a judge about to pass sentence in a criminal case. The system may be used as a stand-alone system, but can also be integrated as a component of a general sentencing support system, e.g. a statistical sentencing information system. The system is a knowledge-based system. The knowledge base (in rule-form) was created primarily by eliciting knowledge from experts (judges, lawyers, academics and probation officers), but also by applying statutory law, case law and legal authoritative texts. It is flexible in the sense, that a user can introduce his1 own preferences (expressed as numerical coefficients) and thereby apply different sentencing principles. The prototype is at present undergoing testing by some of the participating judges



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

61 (#241,962)

6 months
4 (#368,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Case-based reasoning and its implications for legal expert systems.Kevin D. Ashley - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (2-3):113-208.
Ownership.L. Thorne McCarty - 1994 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 9 (2):173-190.

Add more references