Identification Keys, the "Natural Method," and the Development of Plant Identification Manuals

Journal of the History of Biology 42 (1):73 - 117 (2009)

Abstract
The origins of field guides and other plant identification manuals have been poorly understood until now because little attention has been paid to 18th century botanical identification guides. Identification manuals came to have the format we continue to use today when botanical instructors in post-Revolutionary France combined identification keys (step-wise analyses focusing on distinctions between plants) with the "natural method" (clustering of similar plants, allowing for identification by gestalt) and alphabetical indexes. Botanical works featuring multiple but linked techniques to enable plant identification became very popular in France by the first decade of the 19th century. British botanists, however, continued to use Linnaeus's sexual system almost exclusively for another two decades. Their reluctance to use other methods or systems of classification Can be attributed to a culture suspicious of innovation, anti-French sentiment and the association of all things Linnaean with English national pride, fostered in particular by the President of the Linnean Society of London, Sir James Edward Smith. The British aversion to using multiple plant identification technologies in one text also helps explain why it took so long for English botanists to adopt the natural method, even after several Englishmen had tried to introduce it to their country. Historians of ornithology emphasize that the popularity of ornithological guides in the 19th and 20th centuries stems from their illustrations, illustrations made possible by printing technologies that improved illustration quality and reduced costs. Though illustrations are the most obvious features of late 19th century and 20th century guides, the organizational principles that make them functional as identification devices come from techniques developed in botanical works in the 18th century.
Keywords field guide  history of botany  Lamarck  Candolle  natural method  keys
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10739-008-9161-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (3):537-540.
Collection and Collation: Theory and Practice of Linnaean Botany.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):541-562.
A Translation of Carl Linnaeus's Introduction to Genera Plantarum (1737).Staffan Müller-Wille & Karen Reeds - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):563-572.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Carl Linnaeus's Botanical Paper Slips.Isabelle Charmantier & Staffan Müller-Wille - 2014 - Intellectual History Review 24 (2):215-238.
On the Origins of the Quinarian System of Classification.Aaron Novick - 2016 - Journal of the History of Biology 49 (1):95-133.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Identification with Nature: What It is and Why It Matters.Christian Diehm - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):1-22.
Identifying with Our Desires.Christian Miller - 2013 - Theoria 79 (2):127-154.
Psychological Identification, Imagination and Psychoanalysis.Louise Braddock - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):639 - 657.
Identification and Quasi-Desires.James Stacey Taylor - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (1):111-136.
Demonstrative Identification and Descriptive Identification.Michael Durrant - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):213-221.
Perception and Identification, Part II.Peter F. Strawson - 1961 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97:97-120.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
35 ( #260,117 of 2,286,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #106,860 of 2,286,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature