Philosophy of Science 62 (2):227-40 (1995)
Despite a vast philosophical literature on the epistemology of mathematics and much speculation about how, in principle, knowledge of this domain is possible, little attention has been paid to the psychological findings and theories concerning the acquisition, comprehension and use of mathematical knowledge. This contrasts sharply with recent philosophical work on language where comparable issues and problems arise. One topic that is the center of debate in the study of mathematical cognition is the question of innateness. This paper critically examines the controversy
|Keywords||Competence Knowledge Mathematics Psychology Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
From Numerical Concepts to Concepts of Number.Lance J. Rips, Amber Bloomfield & Jennifer Asmuth - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):623-642.
Similar books and articles
Mathematical Engineering and Mathematical Change.Jean-Pierre Marquis - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):245 – 259.
Mathematical Recreation Versus Mathematical Knowledge.Mark Colyvan - 2007 - In Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 109--122.
The Heuristic Function of Mathematics in Physics and Astronomy.Stojan Obradović & Slobodan Ninković - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (4):351-360.
An Enhanced Argument for Innate Elementary Geometric Knowledge and its Philosophical Implications.Helen De Cruz - 2007 - In Bart Van Kerkhove (ed.), New perspectives on mathematical practices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics. World Scientific.
The Innateness Hypothesis and Mathematical Concepts.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2010 - Topoi 29 (1):3-13.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads190 ( #22,711 of 2,158,685 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,668 of 2,158,685 )
How can I increase my downloads?