Justifying Compulsory Environmental Education in Liberal Democracies1

Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):507-526 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The need for education for (as opposed to about) sustainability is urged from many sides. Initiatives in this area tend to focus on formal education. Governmental, supra-governmental and non-governmental bodies all expect much of this kind of education, which is to transform children—and through them society—in the direction of sustainability. Due to the combination of great transformative expectations or ambitions and a focus on schooling (the idea of) compulsory environmental education poses potentially severe problems for governments committed to liberal principles, in particular the principle of state ‘neutrality’ with respect to ‘comprehensive conceptions of the good life’. The central question of this article is whether liberal governments can make environmental education of this kind compulsory without coming into conflict with the liberal principle of state neutrality. I discuss three defences of the compatibility of compulsory environmental education with liberal neutrality, namely those put forward by Derek Bell, Andrew Dobson, and Simon Hailwood, as well as some problems inherent in these defences. In the final section I sketch a form of compulsory environmental education that realises at least some of the aims commonly stated for Education for Sustainability and Education for Sustainable Development, and can be justified on the basis of liberal principles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justifying compulsory environmental education in liberal democracies.Anders Schinkel - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):507-526.
Compulsory autonomy‐promoting education.Anders Schinkel - 2010 - Educational Theory 60 (1):97-116.
What Should be the Moral Aims of Compulsory Sex Education?Jan Steutel & Doret J. de Ruyter - 2011 - British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (1):75-86.
The Subversive Nature of Liberal Education.Jim Shelton - 2010 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):25-29.
Environmental Justice and Rawls’ Difference Principle.Derek Bell - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (3):287-306.
The Demands of Liberal Education.Meira Levinson - 1999 - Oxford University Press UK.
Analyses of contemporary education.Allan C. Ornstein - 1973 - New York,: Crowell. Edited by W. Eugene Hedley.
Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality.Matt Sensat Waldren - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
The Conservative Limits of Liberal Education.Charles W. Harvey - 2010 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):30-36.
Revisiting the liberal and vocational dimensions of university education.David Carr - 2009 - British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (1):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
11 (#976,244)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anders Schinkel
VU University Amsterdam

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Citizenship and the Environment.Andrew Dobson - 2004 - Environmental Values 13 (4):552-554.
Creating green citizens? Political liberalism and environmental education.Derek R. Bell - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (1):37–54.

View all 11 references / Add more references