Knowledge of Language as Self-Knowledge

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a series of early essays, beginning with "Must We Mean What We Say?", Stanley Cavell offers a sustained response to the argument that ordinary language philosophy is nothing more than amateur linguistics, carried out from the armchair -- so that philosophers' claims about "what we say", and what we mean when we say it, are necessarily in need of proper empirical support. The present paper provides a close reading of Cavell and a defense of his argument that, since a philosopher's descriptions of our use of words are supposed to be an expression of *self*-knowledge, they do not require, and indeed cannot possibly find, any empirical justification. This does not guarantee that these descriptions are immune to error, nor does it mean they describe a different range of facts from the ones that are the subject-matter of linguistics and lexicography. Nor, finally, does it follow from this argument that observation of the facts of ordinary usage, as revealed e.g. in linguistic corpora, is of no use to the philosopher of ordinary language. I close with a brief discussion of what the shared nature of linguistic communication shows about how to understand the "we" in "what we say".



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Autobiography of Companions.Byron Davies - 2011 - Modern Language Notes 126 (5):972-978.
Remembering Stanley Cavell.Byron Davies - 2019 - Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies 7:65-68.
Stanley Cavell.Richard Eldridge (ed.) - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Preface to the Cavell Symposium.Duncan Pritchard - 2015 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 5 (1):1.
Stanley Cavell's Vision of the Normativity of Language: Grammar, Criteria, and Rules'.Stephen Mulhall - 2003 - In Richard Thomas Eldridge (ed.), Stanley Cavell. Cambridge University Press. pp. 79--106.
Contending with Stanley Cavell.Stanley Cavell & Russell B. Goodman (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

233 (#56,285)

6 months
83 (#16,982)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Schwenkler
Florida State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 32 references / Add more references