Kantian rigorism and mitigating circumstances

Ethics 117 (1):32–57 (2006)
Tamar Schapiro
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
A task of any moral theory is to account for both the rigidity and the flexibility of moral rules. Utilitarianism faces the problem of building rigidity into a framework that tends towards objectionable flexibility. Kantianism faces the problem of building flexibility into a framework that tends towards objectionable rigidity. I offer an argument on this front on behalf of Kantians. I show how Kantians can maintain that actions are right and wrong "in themselves," while still maintaining that such actions can be corrupted under certain "nonideal" circumstances.
Keywords exceptions  Kantian ethics  nonideal theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/508036
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,954
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Needs Exploitation.Jeremy C. Snyder - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4):389-405.
Kant and Therapeutic Privilege.C. Brown - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (4):321-336.
The Constitutive Approach to Kantian Rigorism.Michael Cholbi - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):439-448.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corrective Justice and Reputation.Geoffrey Scarre - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):305-319.
How Kantian Must Kantian Constructivists Be?Evan Tiffany - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):524 – 546.
Suicide Intervention and Non–Ideal Kantian Theory.Michael Cholbi - 2002 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3):245–259.
Kant's Rigorism: A Problem and A Solution.Miodrag S. Lukich & Elmer H. Duncan - 1965 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):188-191.
Why Should Remorse Be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?Steven Keith Tudor - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
The Murderer at the Door: What Kant Should Have Said.Michael Cholbi - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):17-46.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
192 ( #29,944 of 2,293,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #88,229 of 2,293,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature