Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):462-472 (2008)
One of the perennially intriguing questions regarding Kant’s approach to the human sciences is the relation between his ‘transcendental psychology’ and empirical cognitive psychology. In this paper I compare his analysis of the a priori conditions of human cognition in the Critique of pure reason with his empirical account of the human cognitive faculties in his Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. In comparing his approach to self-consciousness, sensibility, imagination, and understanding in these two works, I argue that Kant distinguishes between the transcendental and empirical aspects of the human cognitive faculties, and regards the transcendental functions as configuring the empirical faculties of human consciousness, or as giving them the structure that they require to become faculties of cognition. I then show that the cognitive faculties of human beings may vary in their empirical operation, even while they are configured by the same transcendental structure. Finally, I characterize Kant’s transcendental psychology in the first Critique as an account of the faculties that are required for a mind to be an agent or subject of cognition, corresponding to his account of the conditions that are required universally and necessarily for something to be an object of cognition.Keywords: Immanuel Kant; Anthropology; Psychology; Cognition; Transcendental; Empirical
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
Kant and the 'Soft Sciences'.Katharina T. Kraus - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):618-624.
What's Philosophical About Kant's Philosophy of the Human Sciences?Thomas Sturm - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):203-207.
Similar books and articles
How Not to Investigate the Human Mind: Kant on the Impossibility of Empirical Psychology.Thomas Sturm - 2001 - In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
From Being to Givenness and Back: Some Remarks on the Meaning of Transcendental Idealism in Kant and Husserl.Sebastian Luft - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):367-394.
Does Kantian Mental Content Externalism Help Metaphysical Realists?Axel Mueller - 2011 - Synthese 182 (3):449-473.
Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist?William Blattner - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):185 – 201.
Humanity as an Object of Respect: Immanuel Kant's Anthropological Approach and the Foundation for Morality.Sibylle Rolf - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (4):594-605.
The Apriority of the Starting-Point of Kant's Transcendental Epistemology.Vasilis Politis - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):255 – 284.
Kant's Transcendental, Empirical, Pragmatic, and Moral Anthropology.Claudia M. Schmidt - 2007 - Kant-Studien 98 (2):156-182.
Empirical, Rational, and Transcendental Psychology: Psychology as Science and as Philosophy.Gary Hatfield - 1992 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. pp. 200–227.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #132,301 of 2,168,611 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,741 of 2,168,611 )
How can I increase my downloads?