Must a Currency Be Centrally Regulated to Be Ethical?

Business Ethics Journal Review 10 (4):21-26 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scharding argues that Bitcoin is unethical on Fichte’s view because its instability makes it unable to guarantee that users can afford what they need to live. She contrasts Bitcoin with currencies controlled by central authorities that can guarantee their stability. Allison objects that not all centrally controlled currencies are stable and not all non-centrally controlled currencies are unstable. I clarify that both stability and a means of securing stability are necessary, but not sufficient, for a currency to be ethical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should Bitcoin Be Classified as Money?Asya Passinsky - 2020 - Journal of Social Ontology 6 (2):281-292.
Moral Assertion.Christoph Kelp - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (3-4):639-649.
The Social Life of Bitcoin.Nigel Dodd - 2018 - Theory, Culture and Society 35 (3):35-56.
Crafting Maxims.Tobey Scharding - 2016 - Teaching Ethics 16 (1):37-53.
Antibodies as Currency: COVID-19’s Golden Passport.Katrina A. Bramstedt - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):687-689.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-23

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tobey Scharding
Stanford University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references