Monsters Among Us

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (sup1):167-184 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are monsters that scare children and monsters that scare grownups, and then there are monsters that scare philosophers of mind. This paper is concerned with this third sort of monster, whose primary representative is the zombie—a living being, physically just like a person but lacking consciousness. Though zombies act like normal people and appear to have normal brains, everything is blank inside. Unfortunately, the term ‘zombie’ covers a narrower class of deficits than is convenient, failing to cover apparently normal human beings lacking propositional attitudes. Davidson’s “Swampman” is supposed to be an example of such a creature, so I will dub individuals who are apparently normal but lack all propositional attitudes ‘swampfolk,’ though this is non-standard terminology. In what follows, I will refer to both zombies and swampfolk as ‘monsters,’ and will similarly designate animals lacking in consciousness or propositional attitudes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-31

Downloads
256 (#108,646)

6 months
40 (#110,671)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Schroeder
Rice University

Citations of this work

The Dilemma of Ahistorical Teleosemantics.Fabian Hundertmark - 2024 - Philosophy of Science 91 (1):58-71.

Add more citations