'Might' Counterfactuals

Linguistics and Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The epistemic thesis is the thesis that a 'might' counterfactual like 'If Matt had gone to the parade, David might have gone to the parade' has the same meaning as 'Maybe, if Matt had gone to the parade, David would have gone to the parade.' I offer a new theory of the counterfactual interpretation of the modal 'might' on which 'might' has the same meaning as 'maybe would'. And I show that, when coupled with a plausible semantics for 'if' clauses, my theory validates the epistemic thesis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-16

Downloads
359 (#67,357)

6 months
173 (#24,785)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ginger Schultheis
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
A Theory of Conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1968 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford,: Blackwell. pp. 98-112.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
Indicative conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):269-286.

View all 24 references / Add more references