David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 4 (1):129-143 (1996)
On the occasion of the 150th birthday of Georg Cantor (1845â1918), the founder of the theory of sets, the development of the logical foundations of this theory is described as a sequence of catastrophes and of trials to save it. Presently, most mathematicians agree that the set theory exactly defines the subject of mathematics, i.e., any subject is a mathematical one if it may be defined in the language (i.e., in the notions) of set theory. Hence the nature of formal definitions plays an important role within the logical foundations of mathematics. Its study is also helpful to answer the question of how it is possible that the set theory as a universal new ontology for the subject of mathematics (as people hoped around 1900) totally failed but nevertheless the language of set theory is successful in all the mathematical practice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
K. Gödel (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik 38 (1):173--198.
Paul Cohen (1963). The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 50 (6):1143-1148.
R. L. Goodstein (1944). On the Restricted Ordinal Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):33-41.
I. Grattan-Guinness (1980). Georg Cantor's Influence on Bertrand Russell. History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):61-93.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
P. T. Johnstone (1987). Notes on Logic and Set Theory. Cambridge University Press.
John Mayberry (1994). What is Required of a Foundation for Mathematics? Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):16-35.
Makmiller Pedroso (2009). On Three Arguments Against Categorical Structuralism. Synthese 170 (1):21 - 31.
Penelope Maddy (2011). Defending the Axioms: On the Philosophical Foundations of Set Theory. Oxford University Press.
Stewart Shapiro (2000). Set-Theoretic Foundations. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:183-196.
I. Grattan-Guinness (1982). Psychology in the Foundations of Logic and Mathematics: The Cases of Boole, Cantor and Brouwer. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (1):33-53.
Mary Tiles (1989). The Philosophy of Set Theory: An Historical Introduction to Cantor's Paradise. Dover Publications.
Michael D. Potter (2004). Set Theory and its Philosophy: A Critical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Stewart Shapiro (2004). Foundations of Mathematics: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Structure. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):16 - 37.
L. H. Kauffman (2012). The Russell Operator. Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):112-115.
F. A. Muller (2001). Sets, Classes, and Categories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):539-573.
Gianluigi Oliveri (2006). Mathematics as a Quasi-Empirical Science. Foundations of Science 11 (1-2):41-79.
Abraham Adolf Fraenkel & Yehoshua Bar-Hillel (eds.) (1966). Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics. Jerusalem, Magnes Press Hebrew University.
Added to index2010-09-01
Total downloads8 ( #467,874 of 1,925,263 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,201 of 1,925,263 )
How can I increase my downloads?