March madness: A case in applied ethics
Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):141-150 (2008)
Abstract
What is at stake when students sell the highly sought-after basketball tickets they receive for free through a university’s lottery system? This article discusses a case in applied ethics taken from the experience of college students and extrapolates from that to the distribution of other scarce resources using lotteries. By examining an event relevant to the actual experience of students, we challenge them to see how normative moral theory may be used and what values are central to moral decision-making. The case includes four analyses from different perspectives and a teaching noteAuthor's Profile
ISBN(s)
0145-5788
DOI
10.5840/teachphil200831216
My notes
Similar books and articles
Case studies by numbers: Journalism ethics learning.Tom Brislin - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (4):221 – 226.
Should professional competence be taught as ethical?Douglas Birkhead - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (4):211 – 220.
Can instruction in engineering ethics change students' feelings about professional responsibility?Golnaz Hashemian & Michael C. Loui - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):201-215.
Teaching ethics and technology with Agora, an electronic tool.Simone Burg & Ibo Poel - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):277-297.
Ethical Argument: Critical Thinking in Ethics.Hugh Mercer Curtler - 1992 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
28 (#418,627)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2009-01-28
Downloads
28 (#418,627)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads