Machiavellianism, profit, and the dimensions of ethical judgment: A study of impact [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 42 (4):339 - 352 (2003)

Abstract
Research by Reidenbach and Robin (1990) provides a means to study the differential impact of three dimensions of attitude toward ethics: moral equity, relativism, and contractualism. It is hypothesized that moral equity will be the most significant predictor of ethical judgment and intent to act. It is also hypothesized that Machiavellianism and profit will affect relativism and contractualism dimensions, but not moral equity. Additionally, it is hypothesized that Machiavellianism will interact with profit to affect intent to act. Moral equity was found to be the only predictor of ethical judgment, and moral equity and contractualism were predictors of intent to act. Machiavellianism impacted contractualism, but not relativism. Corporate profit did not affect either ethical judgment or intent to act, and did not interact with Machiavellianism. Implications for business ethics education and training are discussed.
Keywords ethical decision-making  ethical judgment  Machiavellianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1022552610368
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,182
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
32 ( #291,062 of 2,289,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #148,085 of 2,289,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature