Grazer Philosophische Studien 82 (1):353-373 (2011)

Authors
Robert Schwartzkopff
Universität Hamburg
Abstract
Adherents of Ockham’s fundamental razor contend that considerations of ontological parsimony pertain primarily to fundamental objects. Derivative objects, on the other hand, are thought to be quite unobjectionable. One way to understand the fundamental vs. derivative distinction is in terms of the Aristotelian distinction between ontologically independent and dependent objects. In this paper I will defend the thesis that every natural number greater than 0 is an ontologically dependent object thereby exempting the natural numbers from Ockham’s fundamental razor.
Keywords Neo-Fregeanism  Ockham's Razor  Numbers  Ontological Dependence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/9789401200592_015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How to Properly Lose Direction.Alex Steinberg - 2019 - Synthese 198 (5):4229-4250.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reference to Numbers in Natural Language.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):499 - 536.
Thing and Object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
The Logic in Logicism.Alexander Bird - 1997 - Dialogue 36 (2):341--60.
A Conversation About Numbers.Charles Sayward - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):191-209.
The Number of Planets, a Number-Referring Term?Friederike Moltmann - 2016 - In Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press. pp. 113-129.
Ockham's Razor.Sharon Kaye - 2003 - Think 2 (4):91-95.
Frege's Notion of Logical Objects.Marco Antonio Caron Ruffino - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Substance and Independence in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2013 - In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag. pp. 36-67.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-06-23

Total views
57 ( #199,779 of 2,507,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,768 of 2,507,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes