Not so promising after all: Evaluator-relative teleology and common-sense morality

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):348–356 (2006)
Abstract
Douglas Portmore has recently argued in this journal for a "promising result" – that combining teleological ethics with "evaluator relativism" about the good allows an ethical theory to account for deontological intuitions while "accommodat[ing] the compelling idea that it is always permissible to bring about the best available state of affairs." I show that this result is false. It follows from the indexical semantics of evaluator relativism that Portmore's compelling idea is false. I also try to explain what might have led to this misunderstanding.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2006.00265.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Consequentializing Moral Theories.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):39–73.
Reply to Shafer-Landau, Mcpherson, and Dancy. [REVIEW]Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):463-474.
Non-Compliance Shouldn't Be Better.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-11.
The Moral Oracle's Test.Sven Ove Hansson - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):643-651.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation.Amartya Sen - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (2):113-132.
Against Evaluator Relativity: A Response to Sen.Donald H. Regan - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (2):93-112.
On McCormick and Teleological Morality.Frederick S. Carney - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):81 - 107.
Justifying Group-Specific Common Morality.Carson Strong - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
System Relativism.Charles Sayward - 1988 - Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Consequentialism, Constraints and The Good-Relative-To: A Reply to Mark Schroeder.Jussi Suikkanen - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (March 2009):1-9.
Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative?Douglas W. Portmore - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):363-77.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
135 ( #41,354 of 2,235,796 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #122,346 of 2,235,796 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature