No unchallengeable epistemic authority, of any sort, regarding our own conscious experience – Contra Dennett?

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):107-113 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dennett argues that we can be mistaken about our own conscious experience. Despite this, he repeatedly asserts that we can or do have unchallengeable authority of some sort in our reports about that experience. This assertion takes three forms. First, Dennett compares our authority to the authority of an author over his fictional world. Unfortunately, that appears to involve denying that there are actual facts about experience that subjects may be truly or falsely reporting. Second, Dennett sometimes seems to say that even though we may be mistaken about what our conscious experience is, our reports about “what it’s like to be us” must be correct. That view unfortunately requires a nonstandard and unremarked distinction between facts about consciousness and facts about “what it’s like.” Third, Dennett says that reports about experience may be “incorrigible.” However, that claim stands in tension with evidence, highlighted by Dennett himself, that seems to suggest that people can be demonstrably mistaken about their own experience. Dennett needlessly muddies his case against infallibilism with these unsatisfactory compromises

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Verification, skepticism, and consciousness.William E. Seager - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (1-2):113-133.
What Dennett can't imagine and why.Charles Siewert - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (1-2):93-112.
Conscious experience versus conscious thought.Peter Carruthers - 2006 - In Uriah Kriegel & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Consciousness and Self-Reference. MIT Press.
Daniel Dennett on the nature of consciousness.Susan Schneider - 2007 - In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell. pp. 313--24.
What RoboDennett still doesn't know.Michael Beaton - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (12):3-25.
Appendix a (for philosophers).Frank Jackson - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):897-901.
Time and conscious experience.Joelle Proust - 1994 - In C.C. Gould (ed.), Artifacts, Representations, and Social Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Judgments and drafts eight years later.Andrew Brook - 2000 - In Andrew Brook, Don Ross & David L. Thompson (eds.), Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
95 (#181,589)

6 months
27 (#110,577)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Schwitzgebel
University of California, Riverside

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. Oxford University Press UK.

View all 16 references / Add more references