Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):224-225 (2009)
To support their main claim, Mitchell et al. broach the issue of the relationship between the learning performance of human and nonhuman animals. We show that their argumentation is problematic both theoretically and empirically. In fact, results from learning studies with humans and honey-bees strongly suggest that human learning is not entirely propositional
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Developing Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Boundaries.Phillip Karpowicz, Cynthia B. Cohen & Derek J. Van der Kooy - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (2):107-134.
Causal Cognition in Human and Nonhuman Animals: A Comparative, Critical Review.Derek C. Penn - manuscript
Revisiting the Learning-Without-Awareness Question in Human Pavlovian Autonomic Conditioning: Focus on Extinction in a Dichotic Listening Paradigm.J. Furedy, B. Damke & W. Boucsein - 2000 - Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 35 (1):17-34.
Of Mice and Men: Adorno on Art and the Suffering of Animals.Camilla Flodin - 2011 - Estetika 48 (2):139-156.
An Evolutionary Model for the Learning of Language.Jechil S. Sieratzki & Bencie Woll - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):530-530.
Creating Human-Nonhuman Chimeras: Of Mice and Men.Cynthia B. Cohen - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):3 – 5.
Added to index2009-04-24
Total downloads12 ( #378,405 of 2,171,800 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #76,305 of 2,171,800 )
How can I increase my downloads?