Hypatia 31 (2):275-292 (2016)

Authors
Gina Schouten
Harvard University
Abstract
In this article, I explore a new reason in favor of precollegiate philosophy: It could help narrow the persistent gender disparity within the discipline. I catalog some of the most widely endorsed explanations for the underrepresentation of women in philosophy and argue that, on each hypothesized explanation, precollegiate philosophy instruction could help improve our discipline's gender balance. Explanations I consider include stereotype threat, gendered philosophical intuitions, inhospitable disciplinary environment, lack of same-sex role models for women students in philosophy, and conflicting “schemas” for philosophy and femininity. I argue that, insofar as some combination of these hypothesized explanations accounts for some portion of the underrepresentation of women in philosophy, those of us concerned to make things better have reason to participate in and promote efforts to share philosophy with younger students.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12232
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,666
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking in Education.Matthew Lipman - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (3):303-305.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Three Cheers for the Token Woman!Anca Gheaus - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):163-176.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-17

Total views
38 ( #256,231 of 2,349,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #120,410 of 2,349,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes