Hume Studies 34 (2):189-208 (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Can desires and actions be evaluated as responsive or unresponsive to reasons, in ways that extend beyond the instrumental implications of one's (other) desires? And does there exist any form of inference or reasoning that is practical in nature? Hume is generally supposed to have given an unambiguously negative reply to both of these questions. In particular, he is often taken to have held that no desire, passion, or action may ever be said to be opposed to reasons, except (perhaps) in so far as it is based on a false belief or confused piece of means-ends reasoning. And he is generally taken to have held that the existence of some sort of peculiarly practical form of inference or reasoning is fundamentally ..
|
Keywords | History of Philosophy Major Philosophers |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0319-7336 |
DOI | 10.1353/hms.0.0016 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Hume’s Better Argument for Motivational Skepticism.Elizabeth S. Radcliffe & Richard McCarty - 2018 - Philosophical Explorations 21 (1):76-89.
Strength of Mind and the Calm and Violent Passions.Elizabeth S. Radcliffe - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (3):1-21.
Similar books and articles
Practical Reason and the Structure of Actions.Elijah Millgram - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Special Status of Instrumental Reasons.Stephanie Beardman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (2):255 - 287.
Normative Practical Reasoning.Christian Piller - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):175 - 216.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-16
Total views
139 ( #83,951 of 2,505,200 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,200 )
2010-08-16
Total views
139 ( #83,951 of 2,505,200 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,200 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads