Political Sophistry Ancient and Contemporary

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:345-349 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sophistry is alive and thrives. I argue that this less than venerable tradition modern and contemporary political philosophers continue to this day. I take Protagoras as the archetype sophist, and I show that John Stuart Mill, as does Protagoras, advocates happiness not in an ancient, rational, sense but in a sophistical, passional, sense. Despite their protestations, John Rawls and Robert Nozick continue to advocate a utilitarian happiness of a similar passional sort. The upshot of their sophistry is all too obvious in our present financial crises.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,515

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
14 (#1,180,745)

6 months
9 (#717,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Schollmeier
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references