Family Medicine 45 (2):83-89 (2013)

Authors
Peter H. Schwartz
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Elizabeth Edenberg
Baruch College (CUNY)
Abstract
While several tests and strategies are recommended for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, studies suggest that primary care providers often recommend colonoscopy without providing information about its risks or alternatives. These observations raise concerns about the quality of informed consent for screening colonoscopy.
Keywords Informed Consent  Cancer Screening
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethical Issues with Colorectal Cancer Screening-a Systematic Review.Bjørn Hofmann - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (3):631-641.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parental Consent for Newborn Screening in Southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.
Older Adults and Forgoing Cancer Screening.Alexia M. Torke, Peter H. Schwartz, Laura R. Holtz, Kianna Montz & Greg A. Sachs - 2013 - Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine 173 (7):526-531.
The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-23

Total views
164 ( #54,890 of 2,348,456 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #43,167 of 2,348,456 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes