Procedural versus substantive justice: Rawls and Nozick

Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):164-186 (2007)
Abstract
This paper critically assesses the “procedural” accounts of political justice set forth by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (1971) and Robert Nozick in Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974). I argue that the areas of agreement between Rawls and Nozick are more significant than their disagreements. Even though Nozick offers trenchant criticisms of Rawls's argument for economic redistribution (the “difference principle”), Nozick's own economic libertarianism is undermined by his “principle of rectification,” which he offers as a possible ground in practice for the application of something like the difference principle. Both Rawls's and Nozick's accounts of justice fail because of their abstraction from human nature as a ground of right. At the same time the libertarianism on which they agree in the non-economic sphere would deprive a free society of its necessary moral underpinning. Rawls and Nozick err, finally, by demanding that the policies pursued by a just society conform to theoretical formulas concocted by philosophy professors, rather than leaving room (as Lockean liberalism does) for the adjustment of policies to particular circumstances based on statesmen's prudential judgment and the consent of the governed. Particularly troubling from the perspective of a citizen seriously concerned with the advancement of justice and freedom is both thinkers' shrill denunciations of existing liberal societies for failing to conform to their particular strictures.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052507070070
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,777
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Considering Reasonableness.Shaun Young - 2007 - Politics and Ethics Review 3 (2):163-80.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Arbitrariness, Justice, and Respect.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Social Theory and Practice 26 (1):25-45.
The Separateness of Persons and Liberal Theory.Matt Zwolinski - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):147-165.
Fair Equality of Opportunity.Larry A. Alexander - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Nozick's Reply to the Anarchist.Helga Varden - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585 - 616.
Libertarianism at Twin Harvard.Loren E. Lomasky - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):178-199.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

152 ( #31,300 of 2,177,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,205 of 2,177,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums