Rescue Missions in the Mediterranean and the Legitimacy of the EU’s Border Regime

Res Publica:1-20 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the last seven years, close to twenty thousand people have died trying to reach Europe by crossing the Mediterranean Sea. Rescue missions by private actors and NGOs have increased because both national measures and measures by the EU’s border control agency, Frontex, are often deemed insufficient. However, such independent rescue missions face increasing persecution from national governments, Italy being one example. This raises the question of how potential migrants and dissenting citizens should act towards the EU border regime. In contrast to the literature, which mainly addresses migration on the basis of justice requirements, this article focuses on the legitimate authority of the EU’s border regime. Focusing on the legitimacy criteria for states’ claims to regulate migration opens a fruitful normative perspective, given the pervasive disagreement over the content of justice in migration. What reasons for compliance and non-interference does legitimacy supply for potential immigrants and dissenting citizens? And what legitimacy standard may be appropriate for the power that individual states claim over potential immigrants? We argue that, even assuming a minimal legitimacy standard for the state-migrant relationship, the structure of the EU’s border regime exhibits unique features, which cause it to stand in tension with such a standard. By coordinating its Member States’ border regimes, especially through Frontex, the EU claims and exercises power over potential immigrants. However, the asymmetrical delegation of state powers to the EU means that the power involved in regulating European borders is, in core respects, unaccountable. This unaccountability, we argue, is significant for the legitimacy of the EU’s border regime. This article sheds new light on the morality of unauthorised rescue missions by assessing the permissibility of resistance to the EU’s border regime.

Similar books and articles

Border Rescue.Kieran Oberman - 2020 - In David Miller & Christine Straehle (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Refuge. Cambridge, UK: pp. 78-97.
Irregular Migration and the EU-External Border Policy in Africa: Historical and Philosophical Insights.Olukayode A. Faleye - 2019 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 8 (3):59-76.
Les frontières extérieures de l’Europe et leur sécurisation numérique.Hedwig Wagner - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 63 (2):, [ p.].
The European Immigration Crisis: A Review.Alireza Salehi Nejad - 2016 - Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 10.
Political Legitimacy in International Border Governance Institutions.Terry Macdonald - 2015 - European Journal of Political Theory 14 (4):409-428.
Sovereignty, Territory, and the Legitimacy of the International Order.Colleen Murphy - 2021 - Sage Publications: European Journal of Political Theory 21 (3):608-614.
Legitimizing the Euro-`Polity' and its `Regime'.Richard Bellamy & Dario Castiglione - 2003 - European Journal of Political Theory 2 (1):7-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-16

Downloads
100 (#121,772)

6 months
40 (#25,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Antoinette Scherz
University of Oslo
Hallvard Sandven
Freie Universität Berlin

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.

View all 30 references / Add more references