Reply to Moser.”

In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 54--56 (2004)

J. L. Schellenberg
Mount Saint Vincent University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On What God Would Do.Rob Lovering - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2):87-104.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hiddenness, Evidence, and Idolatry.E. J. Coffman & Jeff Cervantez - 2011 - In Raymond VanArragon & Kelly James Clark (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
Reply to Moser.Richard Foley - 1989 - Analysis 49 (2):89 - 92.
Reply to Moser.Laurence BonJour - 1988 - Analysis 48 (4):164 - 165.
Reply to Quinn and Audi on Philosophy After Objectivity.Paul K. Moser - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):401 - 406.
Can Christians Be Philosophy Professors?Michael T. McFall - 2012 - Teaching Philosophy 35 (1):63-81.
Reply to Quinn and Audi on Philosophy After Objectivity.Review author[S.]: Paul K. Moser - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):401-406.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes