Scopal Independence: A Note on Branching and Wide Scope Readings of Indefinites and Disjunctions

Journal of Semantics 23 (3):281-314 (2006)
Abstract
Hintikka claimed in the 1970s that indefinites and disjunctions give rise to ‘branching readings’ that can only be handled by a ‘game-theoretic’ semantics as expressive as a logic with (a limited form of) quantification over Skolem functions. Due to empirical and methodological difficulties, the issue was left unresolved in the linguistic literature. Independently, however, it was discovered in the 1980s that, contrary to other quantifiers, indefinites may scope out of syntactic islands. We claim that branching readings and the island-escaping behaviour of indefinites are two sides of the same coin: when the latter problem is considered in full generality, a mechanism of ‘functional quantification’ (Winter 2004) must be postulated which is strictly more expressive than Hintikka's, and which predicts that his branching readings are indeed real, although his own solution was insufficiently general. Furthermore, we suggest that, as Hintikka had seen, disjunctions share the behaviour of indefinites, both with respect to island-escaping behaviour and (probably) branching readings. The functional analysis can thus naturally be extended to them
Keywords branching   independencies   language   natural   quantifiers   scope   semantics   wide
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jos/ffl005
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Focus and Uninformativity in Yucatec Maya Questions.Scott AnderBois - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):349-390.
How Indefinites Choose Their Scope.Adrian Brasoveanu & Donka F. Farkas - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):1-55.
Independent Set Readings and Generalized Quantifiers.Livio Robaldo - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (1):23-58.
The Elusive Scope of Descriptions.Daniel Rothschild - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (6):910–927.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How Indefinites Choose Their Scope.Adrian Brasoveanu & Donka F. Farkas - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):1-55.
Quantification.Anna Szabolcsi - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Objections to Wide-Scoping.Daan Evers - 2011 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 83 (13):251-255.
Illusive Scope of Universal Quantifiers.Danny Fox & Uli Sauerland - 1997 - In Jill Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 26. GLSA, UMass Amhert.
The Scope of Even and Quantifier Raising.Kimiko Nakanishi - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):115-136.
Scope Control and Grammatical Dependencies.Alastair Butler - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):241-264.
In Defense of the Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle.Simon Rippon - 2011 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (2):1-21.
Defending the Wide-Scope Approach to Instrumental Reason.Jonathan Way - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 147 (2):213 - 233.
Wide or Narrow Scope?John Broome - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):359-370.
Circumstantial and Temporal Dependence in Counterfactual Modals.Dorit Abusch - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (3):273-297.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

16 ( #292,583 of 2,152,644 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #399,611 of 2,152,644 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums