Social Norms in Artefact Use

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 10 (1):53-65 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of artefacts by human agents is subject to human standards or norms of conduct. Many of those norms are provided by the social context in which artefacts are used. Others are provided by the proper functions of the artefacts. This article argues for a general framework in which norms that are provided by proper functions are related to norms provided by the (more general) social context of use. Departing from the concept, developed by Joseph Raz, of “exclusionary reasons” it is argued that proper functions provide “institutional reasons” for use. Proper use of artefacts (use according to the proper function) is embedded in the normative structures of social institutions. These social normative structures are complementary to traditional norms of practical rationalityand are a kind of second-order reasons: exclusionary reasons. It is argued that proper functions of artefacts provide institutional reasons, which are up to a certain extent similar to exclusionary reasons. The most notable difference concerns the fact that proper functions not so much exclude other types of use, but rather place that use (and the user) in particular social structures with particular rights and obligations. An institutional reason not only gives a reason for action, it also provides reasons for evaluating actions according to such reasons positively (and other negatively). The upshot of the analysis is that it provides an additionaltool for understanding and evaluating the use of artefacts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Norms in Artefact Use.Marcel Scheele - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 10 (1):53-65.
Function and use of technical artefacts: social conditions of function ascription.Marcel Scheele - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):23-36.
Knowledge of artefact functions.Wybo Houkes - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):102-113.
The metaphysics of cognitive artefacts.Richard Heersmink - 2016 - Philosophical Explorations 19 (1):78-93.
The metaphysics of cognitive artifacts.Richard Heersmink - 2016 - Philosophical Explorations 19 (1):78-93.
The normativity of artefacts.Maarten Franssen - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):42-57.
Social norms or social preferences?Ken Binmore - 2010 - Mind and Society 9 (2):139-157.
A Dilemma for Protected Reasons.Christopher Essert - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (1):49-75.
Functional analysis and proper functions.Paul E. Griffiths - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):409-422.
The Problem of Phantom Functions.Sune Holm - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (1):233-241.
Reasons for Action.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):407-427.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
30 (#534,180)

6 months
3 (#980,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?