Statement on the True Relationship of the Philosophy of Nature to the Revised Fichtean Doctrine: An Elucidation of the Former

SUNY Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Schelling's 1806 polemic against Fichte, and his last major work on the philosophy of nature. The heat of anger can concentrate the mind. Convinced that he had been betrayed by his former collaborator and colleague, Schelling attempts in this polemic to reach a final reckoning with Fichte. Employing the format of a book review, Schelling directs withering scorn at three of Fichte’s recent publications, at one point likening them to the hell, purgatory, and would-be paradise of Fichtean philosophy. The central bone of contention is the understanding of nature: Fichte sees it as lifeless matter in motion, sheer opposition to be overcome, while Schelling waxes poetic in his defense of a living, organic nature of which humanity is a vital part. Indeed, we do not know ourselves without understanding our connection to nature, argues Schelling, anticipating many thinkers in contemporary environmental ethics. Dale E. Snow’s introduction sets the stage and explains the larger context of the conflict, which was already visible in the correspondence of the two philosophers, which broke off by 1802. Notes are included throughout the text, providing background information and identifying the many references to Fichte. Dale E. Snow is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University of Maryland and the author of Schelling and the End of Idealism, also published by SUNY Press.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Logic Of Lying.Moses Òkè - 2006 - Sorites 17:27-30.
Discourse about the Future.Michael Clark - 1969 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 3:169-190.
Discourse about the Future.Michael Clark - 1969 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 3:169-190.
Variations on the Liar's Paradox.Joseph Agassi - 1964 - Studia Logica 15 (1):237-238.
The Theoretical Tenability of the Doctrine of Double Effect.T. J. Bole - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):467-473.
Divine Eternity and the Nature of Time.Alan Gregory Padgett - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Lying, fast and slow.Angelo Turri & John Turri - 2019 - Synthese 198 (1):757-775.
The nature of scientific statements.David L. Miller - 1947 - Philosophy of Science 14 (3):219-223.
What's the point of elucidation?Anthony Philip A. Hutchinson - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (5):691-713.


Added to PP

7 (#1,388,675)

6 months
7 (#432,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dale E. Snow
Loyola University Maryland

Citations of this work

Schelling, Bruno, and the sacred abyss.Dale E. Snow - 2024 - Intellectual History Review 34 (1):203-212.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Erklärung in Beziehung auf Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre.Immanuel Kant - 1997 - Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã 2:57-60.

Add more references