Science, truth, and ordinary language

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (1):27-44 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One purpose of this article is to correct the current false assumption that ordinary language is a self-Contained, Self-Sufficient, Absolute framework. Most of the article is devoted to showing how developments in the physical sciences from copernicanism to relativity theory have affected revisions in our conceptual framework, Imposing new representations of the world on our thought. It is suggested that these developments imply a relational conception of the universe described as "contextualistic realism". The challenge facing philosophers today is to revise ordinary language to accommodate recent developments in physics conveying a radically different conception of the universe than that imposed by ordinary language

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language and perception.Richard H. Schlagel - 1962 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (December):192-204.
The truth of scientific claims.Edward MacKinnon - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):437-462.
Psychological concepts, explication, and ordinary language.Hilary Putnam - 1957 - Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Truth and the imperfection of language.Hans Sluga - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):1-26.
Truth and Disquotation.Richard G. Heck Jr - 2005 - Synthese 142 (3):317 - 352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#336,891)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references