Authors
Abstract
Edward Feser defends the ‘Neo-Platonic proof ’ for the existence of the God of classical theism. After articulating the argument and a number of preliminaries, I first argue that premise three of Feser’s argument—the causal principle that every composite object requires a sustaining efficient cause to combine its parts—is both unjustified and dialectically ill-situated. I then argue that the Neo-Platonic proof fails to deliver the mindedness of the absolutely simple being and instead militates against its mindedness. Finally, I uncover two tensions between Trinitarianism and the Neo-Platonic proof.
Keywords Divine Simplicity  God  Incarnation  Neo-Platonic Proof  Trinity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.2021.3412
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Another Look at the Modal Collapse Argument.Omar Fakhri - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):1-23.
Divine Simplicity.William F. Vallicella - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Simplicity and Aseity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2009 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press. pp. 105-28.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on Divine Simplicity.John Lamont - 1997 - The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
Existential Inertia and the Aristotelian Proof.Joseph C. Schmid - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (3):201-220.
Divine Simplicity.Thomas Schärtl - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):51-88.
Platonism About Goodness—Anselm’s Proof in the Monologion.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2019 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 3 (2):1-28.
Platonic Causes Revisited.D. T. J. Bailey - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (1):15-32.
Cudworth and the English Debate on the Trinity.Jan Rohls - 2019 - In Douglas Hedley & David Leech (eds.), Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy. Springer Verlag. pp. 101-115.
The Flexibility of Divine Simplicity.Mark K. Spencer - 2017 - International Philosophical Quarterly 57 (2):123-139.
Simply Impossible: A Case Against Divine Simplicity.R. T. Mullins - 2013 - Journal of Reformed Theology 7 (2):181-203.
Trinity, Simplicity and the Status of God's Personal Relations.James E. Dolezal - 2014 - International Journal of Systematic Theology 16 (1).
Bessarion’s Conception of Platonic Psychology.Athanasia Theodoropoulou - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 70:39-47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-31

Total views
410 ( #23,590 of 2,499,277 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
410 ( #1,050 of 2,499,277 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes