Hyle 10 (1):3 - 4 (2004)
Is chemistry primarily about things or about processes, about chemical substances or about chemical reactions? Is a chemical reaction defined by the change of certain substances, or are substances defined by their characteristic chemical reactions? What appears to be a play on words to the modern scientist, is actually one of the most fundamental ontological question since antiquity, prompted by the most radical change – the chemical change or the ‘coming-to-be and passing-away’ as Aristotle’s treatise on theoretical chemistry came to be known. The question has bothered philosophers ever since, who were not satisfied with the much too simplistic answer of atomism, according to which the basic elements of nature are atoms.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Structured System in Chemistry: Comparison with Mechanics and Biology. [REVIEW]Giovanni Villani - 2014 - Foundations of Chemistry 16 (2):107-123.
Similar books and articles
After Substance: How Aristotle's Question Still Bears on the Philosophy of Chemistry.Paul A. Bogaard - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):853-863.
Chemical "Substances" That Are Not "Chemical Substances".Sr Joseph E. Earley - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):841-852.
Chemical “Substances” That Are Not “Chemical Substances”.Sr Earley - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):841-852.
Objects of Inquiry in Classical Chemistry: Material Substances. [REVIEW]Ursula Klein - 2012 - Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):7-23.
Continuants and Processes in Macroscopic Chemistry.Paul Needham - 2004 - Axiomathes 14 (1-3):237-265.
Some Presuppositions in the Metaphysics of Chemical Reactions.Rom Harré - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (1):19-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #105,915 of 2,164,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,957 of 2,164,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?